<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Beveridge Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk</link>
	<description> Progressive Policies for the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radio 4&#8242;s Analysis on Orange Book by Simon Titley</title>
		<link>http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk/2012/01/08/radio-4s-analysis-on-orange-book/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Titley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk/?p=133#comment-5</guid>
		<description>See my response to this programme here: 
http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/2011/03/guest-post-how-edward-stourton.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my response to this programme here:<br />
<a href="http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/2011/03/guest-post-how-edward-stourton.html" rel="nofollow">http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/2011/03/guest-post-how-edward-stourton.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for a robust debate&#8230; by wit and wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk/2012/01/07/post1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>wit and wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnpughmp.com/deadparrot/?p=1#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Challenging stuff with which I have a lot of sympathy, although there are also strong arguments that the era of Beveridge was a quantum leap away from our current rather comfortable situation.  As ever the answer may be in the middle ground, favouring a core level of provision and good services delivered by whoever can do so best, rather than in complete opposition to the idea of a smaller, more effective state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Challenging stuff with which I have a lot of sympathy, although there are also strong arguments that the era of Beveridge was a quantum leap away from our current rather comfortable situation.  As ever the answer may be in the middle ground, favouring a core level of provision and good services delivered by whoever can do so best, rather than in complete opposition to the idea of a smaller, more effective state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for a robust debate&#8230; by Philip Latham</title>
		<link>http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk/2012/01/07/post1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Latham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnpughmp.com/deadparrot/?p=1#comment-3</guid>
		<description>AS the chair of a small community interest company competing with large private contractors for NHS contracts it is clear that unless there are specific safeguards for social enterprise perhaps with a % of business ring fenced for social enterprise that whatever the fine words in the coalition agreement we are not going to succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS the chair of a small community interest company competing with large private contractors for NHS contracts it is clear that unless there are specific safeguards for social enterprise perhaps with a % of business ring fenced for social enterprise that whatever the fine words in the coalition agreement we are not going to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time for a robust debate&#8230; by David Hands (Professor)</title>
		<link>http://www.beveridgegroup.org.uk/2012/01/07/post1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hands (Professor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnpughmp.com/deadparrot/?p=1#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I fully agree.  this plan needs to be resisted.  I think we need to go back to firrst principles and go back to Beveridge and the &quot;five giants: he sought to eradicate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree.  this plan needs to be resisted.  I think we need to go back to firrst principles and go back to Beveridge and the &#8220;five giants: he sought to eradicate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

